bite the bullet

from the LA Times

City lawmakers voted unanimously to ban the possession of firearm magazines that hold more than 10 rounds.

Mayor Eric Garcetti said he was eager to sign the L.A. measure, which passed 12-0 with three council members absent.

At the Tuesday hearing, the CalGuns Shooting Sports Assn. also raised concerns. “I don’t think it’s going to have any effect on gun violence,” said the association’s director, Chad Cheung, pointing out that people in neighboring cities such as Burbank or Glendale could still possess the magazines.

“Bad people are going to do bad things, and they’ll do it regardless of whatever laws are in place,” Cheung said.

The new ordinance gives Angelenos who own such magazines 60 days to remove, surrender or legally sell or transfer them after it goes into effect. Breaking the law would be a misdemeanor. "

Banning gun magazines which can hold over 10 bullets. Too many bullets in a gun; is this what the L.A. City Council thinks is the most important issue facing residents of Los Angeles??? What about creating jobs, poverty, unaffordable housing, lousy schools, and the worst traffic congestion in the nation? The number of bullets in a gun is more important??? The Los Angeles City Council, and the Mayor, are spending taxpayer time and money passing laws restricting the number of bullets in a gun?

Here's a newsflash:

America name change

It's Time to Rename America

It’s 2015. Where is America? America is missing. America is gone. My country is not the country I grew up in and grew old in. My country is now some other country, it is not America. None of the values which made America, well, America, are present in the new generations being raised in this nation.

No longer a nation "of the people, by the people, and for the people", America is now a nation "of the government, by the government, and for the government." America is no longer is a nation of "individuals" but a nation of local, state and federal government bureaucrats and politicians running our lives. Gone is the founding guiding document, The U.S. Constitution, which exists to protect citizens from its government. The sacred U.S. Constitution has been replaced by “we use it if we feel like it”.

Also missing in action are the concepts of:

Personal responsibility. The taking of responsibility for one’s life and one’s actions.

Opportunity. Not a right but rather something you have to take advantage of.

Freedom. The individual freedom to live your life the way you wish, so long as you harm no one.

Personal responsibility, not a government wish list. Personal opportunity: a basic education, hard work and earning a living, not being handed a life, and being controlled, by the government. Personal freedom from government intervention in all areas of one’s personal life.

America is no longer America – land of the free and home of the brave. We in America are no longer free and no longer brave. We have become a nation of losers, not winners. We have become a nation of whiners, not winners. It’s time to face that fact. I have done that: I have decided not to pine for the past but to acknowledge and accept the future. To that end, I hereby call for an official name change for the United States of America. It is no longer united and is no longer America. America now needs to be officially renamed, it now needs to be called something else.

If you agree, let’s get the ball rolling. Contact your government representatives in Washington immediately and demand an official name change for our once-great, once-free, now bordering-on-extinction country called The United States of America, aka America.

Welcome to the New America.

It turns out that Abraham Lincoln was correct.

ace trumps king

An ace "trumps" a king. And a queen.

Trump It

America is in trouble.
Trump it.

Liberals Made Black Poverty Worse

From Time Magazine

"According to a new report from the Annie E. Casey Foundation, more than one in five American children, about 22%, were living in poverty in 2013. Data for 2014 are not yet available, but the report anticipates that the child poverty rate remains at an “unacceptably high level.”

The figure for 2008 was 18%.

African-American, American Indian and Latino children continued to experience negative outcomes at rates that were higher than the national average. Overall unemployment rates have fallen, but the unemployment rate for African-Americans is currently 11 percent — 2.4 percentage points higher than where it was prior to the economic crisis.

Nearly 40 percent of African-American children live in poverty, compared to 14 percent of white children."

The Democrats have ruled since 2009. With the first black president, Barack Obama, the Democrats have ruled for eight straight years, and has paid little or no attention to the economy, instead concentrating mainly on failed foreign policies, a bloated costly health care program for the poor, and things like gay marriage, the War on Whites, the War on Wealth, and the War on Women. And increasing dependency on government poverty programs. Obama and his liberal cronies get, and deserve, all the blame for 40% of African-American children living in poverty in America.

And blacks overwhelmingly voted for Obama for President, twice, mainly because he is black. 95% of black voters voted for Obama in 2008, 93% in 2012. I guess they thought having a black President was a good idea; I guess they thought he would help them economically, because he's black. I guess they were wrong. Under Obama and his liberal followers, black children in America are worse off than before.

Why do African Americans keep voting for the Democrats, for liberals, if black lives keep getting worse? The definition of insanity is: doing something that doesn't work over and over again and expecting a different result.

racist database

From the New York Post

"a vast and permanent network of discrimination databases, which Obama already is using to make “disparate impact” cases against: banks that don’t make enough prime loans to minorities; schools that suspend too many blacks; cities that don’t offer enough Section 8 and other low-income housing for minorities; and employers who turn down African-Americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds.

Big Brother Barack wants the databases operational before he leaves office, and much of the data in them will be posted online."

"employers who turn down African-Americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds"? Hey, Obama, maybe it's not because they're black, maybe it's because they're fucking CRIMINALS!

I am APPALLED at the idea of this reverse racist anti-white database, let alone its existence! Obama and the liberals have RUINED this country! As for the racist database, no matter what I say or do, the racist database will probably somehow discriminate against me and decide that I, and all white people in America, are racist. Even if it's not true.

What is my response to a government taxpayer funded reverse racism database, created by the Obama administration, which will be specifically used by the federal government to fuck over white people in America? Here's my response: "Hey, Obama, YOU'RE the racist!"

The above is a satirical rant. If you don't know what satire is, look it up in the fucking dictionary.


Based on his lack of support for Israel, I think Barack Obama, the current President of the United States, should hereby be referred to as Oybama.

what is marriage?

Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has legalized same-sex marriage, what is the new legal definition of marriage? It is no longer legally a "union of a man and a woman". Is it a "union of two people, any two people"? Is it the union of three or more people? I don't know, I'm just an ignorant old white male citizen and voter.

I looked up the new legal definition of "marriage", based on the same-sex marriage ruling, in Google and could find nothing. Apparently, there is no new legal definition of marriage. "If it's not in Google, it doesn't exist".

I am confused. If the old definition of marriage is no longer legal or valid I want to know what the new legal definition of marriage is! If I asked the President of the United States, or the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, they would probably give me the popular new answer to nearly every question: "I don't know".

If the government is going to legally redefine marriage don't they need to provide us citizens with the new definition? Otherwise, we won't know who, or how many, or what, to marry.

Or maybe we can Marry Christmas.

ban July 4th


"An extensive new study led by scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration concludes that watching fireworks shows, under certain weather conditions, can pose significant health risks to audiences. The research, recently published in the journal Atmospheric Environment, flags the danger posed by fine particulate matter released into the air by exploding fireworks. Anyone perfectly downwind who inhales that extra dust, smoke, and soot could suffer anything from simple coughing spells to asthma attacks, stroke, or cardiac arrest."

It seems that EVERYTHING we humans do is unhealthy! Now, July 4th fireworks are hazardous to your health? Hey, here's an idea: why doesn't the government just BAN July 4th altogether? According to liberals, "America is a bad country", so why should we celebrate it? The EPA could ban July 4th for environmental reasons and Health and Human Services could ban it for health reasons. And the Supreme Court could uphold it as legal. Done deal. The extreme liberals and extreme environmentalists win again! Banning the 4th of July. That would be ANOTHER feather in a liberal's cap.

spend more

government overspending

From the Denver Post

"A top Department of Veterans Affairs official said Wednesday that his agency may never explain precisely how a hospital project in Aurora with a $604 million construction budget skyrocketed to $1.73 billion in barely two years.

Members of Congress, including Democratic Sens. Michael Bennet of Colorado and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, have asked for a detailed account of the price increase, saying those numbers must exist.

But during a news conference at the construction site, VA Deputy Secretary Sloan Gibson said not to expect a line-item description of the $1.1 billion difference.

"You're not going to find a dollar-by-dollar account," he said."

What's the big deal? The cost has nearly tripled in two years. With no accounting and no accountability. That's par for the course when it comes to government spending. No big deal, it's only another 1.1 billion dollars overspending of our tax dollars. It's not like it's the VA's money, or the government's money, it's only the TAXPAYER'S money. Yes, I am being sarcastic.